World Liberty Financial

World Liberty Financial
Denominations
SymbolWLFI
CodeWLFI
Development
White paperWhite paper
Initial releaseSeptember 16, 2024 (2024-09-16)
Latest releaseSeptember 1, 2025 (2025-09-01)
Development statusActive
Written inSolidity (Ethereum), Rust (Solana)
Operating systemCross-platform
DeveloperWorld Liberty Financial Inc.
Ledger
Block explorerEtherscan
Circulating supply24.67 billion WLFI (Sept 2025)
Supply limit100 billion WLFI
Website
Websiteworldlibertyfinancial.com

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) is a decentralized finance protocol developed by its namesake company. It was founded in 2024 by Zachary Folkman, Chase Herro, Alex Witkoff, Zach Witkoff, and Trump family members. It is a business venture of the Trump family. The Trump family receives 75% of net proceeds when WLFI sells tokens, as well as gets a cut of stablecoin profits. By December 2025, the Trumps had profited $1 billion on proceeds, while holding $3 billion worth of unsold tokens.

The company has been subject of media coverage concerning potential conflicts of interest related to Donald Trump's involvement, including reports about business relationships with foreign entities and other partners. One of World Liberty's few publicly known investors is Chinese-born billionaire Justin Sun; shortly after Trump took office in 2025, Sun invested $30 million into World Liberty and an SEC investigation into him was subsequently dropped. In 2025, President Trump pardoned Changpeng Zhao, who had been convicted of anti-money-laundering compliance failures, after his company Binance had helped enrich World Liberty Financial.

In 2025, a firm associated with the Abu Dhabi government purchased $2 billion worth of USD1 stablecoins from World Liberty and secretly bought a 49% stake in the company for half a billion dollars; shortly hereafter, the Trump administration approved a plan to give the UAE firm hundreds of thousands of advanced, scarce computer chips, despite national security concerns. Legal experts have described the UAE deal as a potential violation of the emoluments clause of the U.S. Constitution.