The Tidelands Case
| The Tidelands Case | |
|---|---|
| Original jurisdiction Decided June 23, 1947 | |
| Full case name | United States v. California |
| Citations | 332 U.S. 19 (more) |
| Outcome | |
| California is not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast, and the Federal Government, rather than the State, has paramount rights in and power over that belt, an incident to which is full dominion over the resources of the soil under that water area, including oil. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Per curiam | |
United States v. California, 332 U.S. 19 (1947), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that California is not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast, and the Federal Government, rather than the State, has paramount rights in and power over that belt, an incident to which is full dominion over the resources of the soil under that water area, including oil. The case was better known in its time as The Tidelands Case, although this was a misnomer because it did not involve tidelands.