US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen
| US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen | |
|---|---|
| Decided April 16, 2013 | |
| Full case name | US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen |
| Citations | 569 U.S. 88 (more) |
| Holding | |
| When someone seeks equitable relief to enforce an ERISA plan, the terms of the plans govern but equitable doctrines can fill gaps in the terms. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Kagan |
| Dissent | Scalia, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito |
US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen, 569 U.S. 88 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that when someone seeks equitable relief to enforce an ERISA plan, the terms of the plans govern but equitable doctrines can fill gaps in the terms.