USAID v. Alliance for Open Society International (2020)
| Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Argued May 5, 2020 Decided June 29, 2020 | |
| Full case name | Agency for International Development, et al. v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc., et al. |
| Docket no. | 19-177 |
| Citations | 591 U.S. ___ (more) 140 S. Ct. 2082 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | |
| Holding | |
| Because plaintiffs’ foreign affiliates possess no First Amendment rights, applying the Policy Requirement to them is not unconstitutional. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Kavanaugh, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch |
| Concurrence | Thomas |
| Dissent | Breyer, joined by Ginsburg, Sotomayor |
| Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amend. I | |
Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc., 591 U.S. ___ (2020), also known as AOSI II (to distinguish it from the 2013 case), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that compelled speech required as a condition for funding on foreign non-governmental affiliates of U.S. non-government organizations does not violate First Amendment rights.