Restoring Control over the Immigration System
| Restoring Control over the Immigration System | |
|---|---|
CP 1326 | |
| Created | 12 May 2025 |
| Location | Palace of Westminster Online version PDF version |
| Author(s) | Home Office Government of the United Kingdom |
| Purpose | To outline comprehensive reforms to the UK's immigration system, reduce net migration, and create a "controlled, selective and fair" system linking immigration policy to skills training and integration. |
Restoring Control over the Immigration System is a 2025 white paper published by the Starmer ministry on 12 May 2025, outlining comprehensive reforms to UK immigration policy. The 80-page document represents the most sweeping changes to Britain's legal migration framework in over a decade, aimed at significantly reducing net migration and creating what the government describes as a "controlled, selective and fair" immigration system.
The white paper introduces major policy changes across work, study, family and settlement routes, including doubling the qualifying period for citizenship from five to ten years, ending overseas recruitment for care workers, and raising skill requirements for skilled worker visas to graduate level. The reforms are designed to shift away from what Prime Minister Keir Starmer characterised as the previous Conservative government's "one-nation experiment in open borders", which saw net migration rise from 224,000 in 2019 to 906,000 in 2023.
The proposals have generated significant controversy, with Starmer's accompanying speech containing language critics compared to Enoch Powell's 1968 Rivers of Blood speech. Business groups, immigration lawyers and civil society organisations warned the changes could cost employers over £14,000 per sponsored worker and create severe labour shortages in key sectors. The white paper was widely viewed as a response to the rise of Reform UK, which won 30% of the vote in the May 2025 local elections on an anti-immigration platform.
Analysis suggested the controversy had political consequences for Starmer. Research by the New Statesman found that the speech "backfired", showing "a drop in Labour support" with "no modelling scenario where we find the speech has any positive effect". The study found the speech made immigration 3 percentage points more salient and reduced support for all left-of-centre parties by 1.5 percentage points. The apology was described as "another climbdown from Number 10 amid backlash from MPs", with the controversy described as "yet another internal Labour dispute" over Starmer's political positioning on immigration.