Patel v. Garland
| Patel v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Argued December 6, 2021 Decided May 16, 2022 | |
| Full case name | Pankajkumar S. Patel, et al. v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General |
| Docket no. | 20-979 |
| Citations | 596 U.S. 328 (more) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Holding | |
| Federal courts lack jurisdiction to review facts found as part of any judgment relating to the granting of discretionary relief in immigration proceedings enumerated under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2). | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Barrett, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh |
| Dissent | Gorsuch, joined by Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan |
| Laws applied | |
| Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 | |
Patel v. Garland, 596 U.S. 328 (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that federal courts lack jurisdiction to review factual findings underlying judgments related to discretionary relief in immigration proceedings under .