Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter
| Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter | |
|---|---|
| Decided June 10, 2013 | |
| Full case name | Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter |
| Citations | 569 U.S. 564 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Under the limited judicial review allowed for decisions from binding arbitation, the sole question is whether the arbitrator arguably interpreted the parties' contract, not whether the arbitrator erred. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Kagan, joined by unanimous |
| Concurrence | Alito, joined by Thomas |
| Laws applied | |
| Federal Arbitration Act | |
Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter, 569 U.S. 564 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that, under the limited judicial review allowed for decisions from binding arbitration, the sole question is whether the arbitrator arguably interpreted the parties' contract, not whether the arbitrator erred.