Kucana v. Holder
| Kucana v. Holder | |
|---|---|
| Argued November 10, 2009 Decided January 20, 2010 | |
| Full case name | Agron Kucana, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General |
| Docket no. | 08-911 |
| Citations | 558 U.S. 233 (more) 130 S.Ct. 827 |
| Holding | |
| The statute that makes certain discretionary determinations of the Attorney General immune to judicial review does not allow the Attorney General to declare determinations discretionary and immune to review via regulations. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Ginsberg, joined by Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Sotomayor |
| Concurrence | Alito |
| Laws applied | |
Kucana v. Holder, 558 U.S. 233 (2010), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the statute that makes certain discretionary determinations of the attorney general immune to judicial review does not allow the attorney general to declare determinations discretionary and immune to review via regulations.