EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining
| EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining | |
|---|---|
| Argued March 25, 2025 Decided June 18, 2025 | |
| Full case name | Environmental Protection Agency v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC |
| Docket no. | 23-1229 |
| Citations | 605 U.S. 627 (more) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Calumet Shreveport Refining v. EPA 86 F.4th 1121 (5th Cir. 2023) |
| Holding | |
| The EPA's denials of small refinery exemption petitions are locally or regionally applicable actions that fall within the "nationwide scope or effect" exception of the Clean Air Act, requiring venue in the D.C. Circuit. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Jackson |
| Dissent | Gorsuch, joined by Roberts |
| Laws applied | |
| Clean Air Act | |
EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, 605 U.S. 627 (2025), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the Environmental Protection Agency's denials of small refinery exemption petitions are locally or regionally applicable actions that fall within the "nationwide scope or effect" exception of the Clean Air Act, requiring venue in the D.C. Circuit.