CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood
| CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood | |
|---|---|
| Decided January 10, 2012 | |
| Full case name | CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood |
| Citations | 565 U.S. 95 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Because the Credit Repair Organizations Act is silent on whether claims can proceed in an arbitrable forum, the Federal Arbitration Act requires the arbitration agreement to be enforced according to its terms. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Scalia |
| Concurrence | Sotomayor (in judgment), joined by Kagan |
| Dissent | Ginsburg |
| Laws applied | |
| Credit Repair Organizations Act; Federal Arbitration Act | |
CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood, 565 U.S. 95 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that because the Credit Repair Organizations Act is silent on whether claims can proceed in an arbitrable forum, the Federal Arbitration Act requires the arbitration agreement to be enforced according to its terms.