Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.
| Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Decided May 4, 2009 | |
| Full case name | Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc. |
| Citations | 556 U.S. 635 (more) |
| Holding | |
| A district court's order remanding a case to state court after declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims is not a remand for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Therefore, the denial may be appealed within the federal system. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by unanimous |
| Concurrence | Stevens |
| Concurrence | Scalia |
| Concurrence | Breyer, joined by Souter |
Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc., 556 U.S. 635 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a federal district court's order remanding a case to state court after declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims is not a remand for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Therefore, the denial may be appealed within the federal system.