Biden v. Texas
| Biden v. Texas | |
|---|---|
| Argued April 26, 2022 Decided June 30, 2022 | |
| Full case name | Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. v. Texas, et al. |
| Docket no. | 21-954 |
| Citations | 597 U.S. 785 (more) 142 S.Ct. 2528 |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Decision | Opinion |
| Case history | |
| Prior | |
| Holding | |
| The Government's rescission of the Migrant Protection Protocols did not violate section 1225 of the INA, and the October 29 Memoranda constituted final agency action. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Roberts, joined by Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh |
| Concurrence | Kavanaugh |
| Dissent | Alito, joined by Thomas, Gorsuch |
| Dissent | Barrett, joined by Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch (all but first sentence) |
| Laws applied | |
| Administrative Procedure Act Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 | |
Biden v. Texas, 597 U.S. 785 (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case related to administrative law and immigration in which the Court held that that the federal government has the authority to revoke the Migrant Protection Protocols, known unofficially as the "Remain in Mexico" policy.